A Brief Introduction Human Resource Policies
Keywords:
Small Business, Employment Opportunity, Performance EvaluationsAbstract
Human asset strategies are the conventional standards and rules that organizations set up to employ, train, evaluate, and reward the individuals from their labor force. These strategies, when coordinated and spread in an effortlessly utilized structure, can serve to pre-empt numerous misconceptions among workers and managers about their privileges and commitments in the business place. It is enticing, as another entrepreneur, to zero in on the worries of the current business and put off the assignment of reviewing a human asset strategy. All business examiners and work legal counsellors will encourage another entrepreneur to get an arrangement down on paper, regardless of whether it is a basic one drafted from a standard model. Having strategies composed is significant so it is obvious to all what the approaches are and that they are applied reliably and reasonably across the association. Additionally, when issues concerning representative rights and friends’ arrangements precede government and state courts, it is standard practice to expect that the organization's human asset approaches, regardless of whether composed or verbal, are a piece of a work contract between the worker and the organization. Without plainly composed strategies, the organization is off guard.
References
Accenture. 2017. Technology vision 2017: Technology for people. Dublin, Ireland: Accenture.
Basso, O., Fayolle, A., and Bouchard, V. 2009. Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Making of a Concept. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 10(4): 313–321. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009790012327
Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., and de Reuver, M. 2019. Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs? Telecommunications Policy, 43(9), 101828.
Bulmash, J. 2008. Human Resources Management and Technology. Retrieved from: https://catalogue.pearsoned.ca/assets/hip/us/hip_us_pearsonhighered/samp. 0132270870pdf [Accessed 17 March 2020]
Cappelli, P., Tambe, P., and Yakubovich, V. 2019. Artificial intelligence in human resources management: challenges and a path forward. Available at SSRN 3263878.
Castelfranchi, C. 1998. Modelling social action for AI agents. Artificial intelligence, 103(1-2): 157-182.
Covin, J. G., and Slevin, D. P. 1991. A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Fall: 7-25.
Dimitratos, P., and E. Plakoyiannaki, E. 2003. “Theoretical Foundations of an International Entrepreneurial Culture. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(2): 187–215.
Ellis, P. (2011). Social Ties and International Entrepreneurship: Opportunities and Constraints Affecting Firm Internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1): 99–127.
Grace, K., Salvatier, J., Dafoe, A., Zhang, B., and Evans, O. 2018. When will AI exceed human performance? Evidence from AI experts. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 62: 729-754.
Ghobakhloo, M., Sabouri, M.S., Hong, T.S., & Zulkifli, N. 2011. Information technology adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises; an appraisal of two decades literature. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1(7): 53-80.
Hult, G.T.M., Hurley, R.F., & Knight, G.A. 2004. Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5): 429–438.
Hurley, R.F., and Hult, G.T.M. 1998. Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3): 42–54.
Jarrahi, M.H. 2018. Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4): 577-586.
Knight, G.A. 1997. Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(3): 213-225.
