Energy Sector and Business Development of a Developing Economy: Evidence From Nigeria

Authors

  • Patrick L Akpan Department of Business Administration, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.
  • Ujunwa C. Okoye Department of Management Technology, Federal University of Technology Owerri, Owerri West, Nigeria.
  • Paul Nnaemeka Nwabisi Department of Business Administration, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.

Keywords:

Aniza Energy Sector, Least Square Techniques, Business Development

Abstract

This paper focuses on energy sector and Business Growth of a developing economy with particular reference to Nigeria. Fundamental problem inherent here has resulted in the use of obsolete technological equipment, low installed capacity, poor power generation, depreciation of equipment, ineffective regulatory framework and water and gas constraints amongst others. These constraints impact greatly on energy generation and supply thereby affecting survival of business and their performance. The ordinary least square technique (OLS) was adopted in the methodology. The result reveals significant linkage between energy supply and business development. This study therefore advocates the use of improved equipment and improvement of Energy supply rate so as to foster economic and business growth. A negation of this paralyses the survival of business organizations.

How to cite this article: Akpan PI, Okoye UC, Nwabisi PN. Energy Sector and Business Development of a Developing Economy: Evidence From Nigeria. J Adv Res Busi Law Tech Mgmt 2019; 2(2): 3-10.

References

1. Abdulah M. Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) Scores electricity firms, Business publications, Daily Trust, 2016; 17.
2. Abeberese AB. Electricity Cost and Firm Performance. Evidence from India, Department of Economics, Columbia University, New York. 2012.
3. Abraham C, Sheeran P. Acting on intentions. The role of anticipated regrest. British Journal of Social Psychology publications 2013; 42: 495-511.
4. Adegbemi BO, Adegbemi OO, Babatunde OO. Energy Consumption and Nigeria economic growth: an empirical analysis. European Scientific Journal 2013; 9(4): 25-40.
5. Akuru UB, Okoro OI. Economics Implications of Constant Power Outages on SMEs in Nigeria. 2011. Available at: https//www.cplisccp/057/vol10028/ccp57vol1okoropublications (accessed 17 April 2014).
6. Ansoff I. Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expression. McGraw- Hill. 1965.
7. Anuda O. Tapping great growth potentials from SMEs. 2013; 31.
8. Agagu O. National Electricity Policy, National Council on Privatization Publications, Abuja. 2000.
9. Attigah B, Mayer-Tasch L. Productive use of Energy (PRODUSE): The Impact of Electricity Access On Economic Development: A literature review, G12, Eschbom. 2013.
10. Aqeel A, Butt MS. The relationship between Energy consumption and Economic Growth in Pakistan. Asia Pacific Development Journal 2001; 8(2): 101-110.
11. Awosipe CO. Power Demanded But Not Supplied. The Agonizing Roles of Emergency Power Supply and Transmission System Inadequacy. University of Lagos Press. Inaugural Lecture Series. 2003.
12. Bacon RW. Privatization and Reform in the global electricity supply industry. Energy environment Ann Rev 1995; 26: 331-359.
13. Tonei B, Tenenaham B, Woolf F. Regulation by Contract. A new way to Privatize Electricity Distribution World bank Paper 14. 2003.
14. Baron, Noriga & Fontenla. Public Infrastructure and Economic Growth in Mexico Mimeograph. 2005.
15. Berisha & Nnamani M. The Role of Information Technology in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Kosova-MilboneBerisha @yahoo.com Faculty of Economics, University of Pristine, Koswa. 2009.
16. Berstien, James BB, Wolak FA et al. Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California’s Structures Wholesale Market. American Economic Review 2002; 92(5).
17. Belifo O. Discos Meter less than 10% of customers in 2016 projection, business day publications. 2016; 6.
18. Cheng BS, Lai TW. An investigation of Co-integration and Causality between Energy Consumption and Economic Activity in Taiwan. Energy Economics 1997; 19(4): 435-444.
19. Chebbi HE, Boujelbene Y. Long and Short run Linkages between Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and Co2 Emission in Tunisia. Economic Research forum W.P No 485. 2009.
20. Chikuni E, Okoro OI. Power Sector Reforms in Nigeria Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa 2007; 18(3).
21. Chikwendu CC. Change over from Kerosene to LPG Use. A family Case Study. Lagos: Friends of the Environment. 2011.
22. Chukezi CO. Gender and Renewal energy in Rural Nigeria. International NGO Journal 2009; 4(7): 33-336.
23. Danttama, Abdulahi, Nasiru. Evaluating investment on basic infrastructure in Nigeria. Proceedings of the eight annual conferences of the zonal research units: Organised by Research Department, Central Bank of Nigeria. 2012.
24. Aminu D. National Integrated Infrastructure Master Plan (NIMP), ICRC Paper on NIMP, 2014.
25. Dinkelmann T. The effects of rural electrification on employment new evidence from South Africa. Population Studies center Research Report. 2008.
26. Energy Commission of Nigeria. National Energy Policy Publications, Garki, Abuja. 2003.
27. Erbaykai E. Disaggregate Energy Consumption and Economic Growth. Evidence from Turkey. International Research Journal of Financial Economics 2008; 1(20).
28. ESMAP. Rural Electrification and Development in the Philistines: Measuring the Social and Economic benefits, ESMAP Report 255/02, World Bank. 2002.
29. Faridula H. Energy Consumption and Economic Growth. A causality analysis for Malaysia: Energy Economics publications. 2011.
30. Fisher, Galetovic. Public Private partnerships: When and How, Hill house Avenue, New Haven CT 06511, Yale University. 2008.

Published

2019-12-30