Strategies for the Development of Integrated Infill Buildings in Historic Contexts
Rapid urbanization, westernization, and modernization that are taking place have great impacts on life-style and the material culture of the people around. ‘Infill buildings development;’ its simplest manifestation is the organization or re-development of parcel land that has been bypassed and still vacant and underutilized as a result of the progressing processes. Infill development can happen everywhere, it can be parcel of land that is underutilized compared to the surroundings such as urban areas, village settings or areas with large lot of developments. Infill building is also a part of mixed-use land development, is the concept that is mostly use in housing strategies to provide affordable housing or to solve demand for some various types of buildings development. However, historic contexts which gives info about the historic trends or history of certain locality usually faced problems due to the growth in population and high increasing demands of the infill buildings in conjunctions with lack of proper designs. Today, professionals such as architects, planners, builders as well as concerned politicians in most of the regions are working towards the improvement of historic contexts, by expanding and increasing the density of the existing areas to create good walk-able neighborhoods that respect each other. Although some still assumed there is a problem in preserving historic places and boosting the historic densities. Moreover, proper integrated infill buildings in historic contexts represents us with sustainable developments, economic and cultural growths, as well as social and environmental opportunities. Consequently, using the literature survey as method of generating data, this paper will theoretically discuss the effective strategies and concepts for the development of integrated infill buildings in any historic contexts. The paper will also explore responsible infill buildings development in the historic contexts. While exploring the strategies, the discussions include best ways to maintain the historic contexts and also ways of embracing the existing contexts through infill buildings development.
2. Chapman D. Creating Neighborhoods and Places in the Built Environment. Taylor & Francis, UK: 1996. Available at www e Library.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.
3. Demiri K. New Architecture as Infill in Historical Context. Architecture and Urban Planning 2013; 7: 44-50.
4. Doratlı N, Önal Hoşkara Ş, Fasli, M. An Analytical Methodology for Revitalization Strategies in Historic Urban Quarters: A Case Study of the Walled City of Nicosia, North Cyprus. Cities 2007; 21(4): 329-348.
5. Ercan M. Challenges and Conflicts in Achieving Sustainable Communities in Historic Neighborhoods of Istanbul. Science Direct, Habitat International 2011; 35: 295-306.
6. Friedman E. Vacant Properties in Baltimore: Strategies for Reuse. Submission for the Abell Foundation Award in Urban Policy, 1/18/03. 7. Galvin P. City of Burbank: Citywide Historic Context Report. Preservation Associates Redondo Beach 2009; 310: 792-2690.
8. Greenberg M, Lowrie K, Mayer H et al. Brownfield Redevelopment as a Smart Growth Option in the United States. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Environmentalist 2001; 21: 129–143.
9. Golding F. Building in Context: New Development in Historic Areas. London, UK. English Heritage/Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment 2001; CABE.
10. Hagen J. Historic Preservation in Nazi Germany: Place, Memory, and Nationalism. Science Direct, Journal of Historical Geography 2009; 35: 690–715.
11. Housing Policy Debate. The Future of Infill Housing in California: Opportunities, Potential, and Feasibility. USA 2010; Available online: NO. 31: Available at http:// www.tandfonline.com.
12. Keith W. An Exploration of Suburban Infill. Conference Paper, National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, USA, 2007.
13. Lardner H. Development for Hobsons Bay City Council: Guidelines for Infill Development in Heritage Areas. Hobsons Bay City Council 2006; 6.
14. Lehmann S. Sustainability on the Urban Scale: Green Urbanism -Mark II: Journal of Green Building 2007; 2 (3): 59-78.
15. Milford. DDA. Available from: www.meetmeinmilford. com/dda/Design-Infill.htm 2001.
16. Montgomery J. Cultural Quarters as Mechanisms for Urban Regeneration. Part 1: Conceptualizing Cultural Quarters. Taylor & Francis, Planning, Practice & Research 2003; 18(4): 293–306.
17. Nguyen H M. Cultural Sustainability in the Architectural Development of Viet Nam. International Conference on Sustainable Architectural Design and Urban Planning, Hanoi Architectural University, May 15-16, 2007.
18. Parker L. Guidelines for Local Surveys: A Basis for Preservation Planning. National Register Bulletin 24, National Register of Historic Places, Department of the Interior Washington, DC 1985.
19. Pendlebury J, Michael S, Aidan W. Urban World Heritage Sites and the Problem of Authenticity. Cities 2009; 26: 349-358.
20. Planning Policy Statement PPS5. Historic Environment Planning Practice Guide. Available at the Website: www.communities.gov.uk. 2010; 5.
21. Report No. 38. Infill Development Strategies for Shaping Livable Neighborhoods: Municipal Research & Services Center of Washington, USA 1997.
22. Ryan B, Weber R. Development Strategies in Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods: Valuing New Development in Distressed Urban Neighborhoods 2007. Available at http://www.informedesign.org/Rs_detail. aspx?rsId=3383 23. SAN DIEGO. Historic Context Statement: City of San Diego Historical Resources Board. San Diego 2007; CA 92-101.
24. Simon M. Modernity and Context: Hungarian Architecture at the Beginning of the Kádár Era. Periodica Polytechnica Architecture 2007; 3(81): 1-8.
25. Tavernor R, Gassner G. Visual Consequences of the Plan: Managing London’s Changing Skyline. City, Culture and Society 2010; 1(2): 99–108.
26. Tyrrell R. A Cultural Perspective of Sustainable Architecture: Culture Climate Place. Medio Ambiente Comportamiento Humano 2003; 4(2): 83-90.
27. Tweed C, Sutherland M. Built Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Urban Development. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning 2007; 83: 62-69.
28. Winter V. Historic Districts in Anderson, South Carolina: Design Guide Lines, USA 2003. 29. Yahner TG, Nadenicek, D J. Community by Design: Contemporary Problems Historic Resolve. Elsevier Science, Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning 1997; 39: 137-15.