Surgical Planning Visualisation and Interaction System

Authors

  • Dr. Bharti CSE, Chandigarh University, Mohali, India
  • Vasu Goel Bachelors’s of Engineering(CSE), Chandigarh University, Mohali, India

Keywords:

User interface, image-guided surgery, Aug- mented Reality, Visualisation, Interaction System

Abstract

Modern technologies significantly improve mini- mally invasive surgical procedures via the use of medical image processing and visualisation, 3D organ reconstruction, and intra- operative surgical guidance. Minimally Invasive Surgery is more common and well accepted as an alternative to the standard approach. Surgeons have some limitations while using this method. The restricted capacity to perceive depth and properly gauge the distance of objects during laparoscopic surgery may impede exact dissection or suturing. The use of innovative pre-operative planning tools has the potential to significantly advantage the surgeon. This study presents a visualisation and interaction system that allows surgeons to see a three-dimensional representation of a patient’s organs, which is generated using CT images. Surgeons have access to many visualisation techniques during laparoscopy, and an Augmented Reality application allows them to choose the best locations for inserting trocars on a 3D virtual model. These patches might be seen on the patient’s body. We have analysed two case studies. The gadget may be used for diagnostic purposes, as well as for planning surgical procedures and providing visual aid throughout the surgery.

References

Camara, O., Colliot, O., and Bloch, I. Computational Modeling of Thoracic and Abdominal Anatomy Using Spatial Relationships for Image Segmentation. Real Time Imaging, 2004, 10(4), 263-273..

Kitasaka, T. et al. Automated extraction of abdominal organs from uncontrasted 3D abdominal X-Ray CT images based on anatomical knowledge. Journal of Computer Aided Diagnosis of Medical Images, 2005, 9(1), 1-14.

Furtado, H., and Gersak, B. Minimally Invasive Surgery and Augmented Reality. New Technology Frontiers in Minimally Invasive Therapies, 2007, 195-201.

Sielhorst, T., Obst, T. et al. An Augmented Reality Delivery Simula- tor for Medical Training, Workshop on Augmented Environments for Medical Imaging (MICCAI 2004), 11-20.

Samset, E., Schmalstieg, D., Vander Sloten, J., Freudenthal, A., De- clerck, J., Casciaro, S., Rideng, Ø., and Gersak, B. Augmented Reality in Surgical Procedures. SPIE Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XIII, 2008.

Bichlmeier, C., Wimmer, F., Michael, H.S., and Nassir, N. Contextual Anatomic Mimesis: Hybrid In-Situ Visualization Method for Improving Multi-Sensory Depth Perception in Medical Augmented Reality. Sixth IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR ’07), 2007, 129-138.

Navab, N., Feuerstein, M., and Bichlmeier, C. Laparoscopic Virtual Mirror - New Interaction Paradigm for Monitor Based Augmented Reality. IEEE Virtual Reality Conference 2007 (VR 2007), Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, 2007, 10-14.

De Paolis, L.T., Pulimeno, M., Lapresa, M., Perrone, A., and Aloisio,

G. Advanced Visualization System Based on Distance Measurement for an Accurate Laparoscopy Surgery. Joint Virtual Reality Conference of EGVE - ICAT - EuroVR, Lyon, France, 2009.

Yushkevich, P.A., Piven, J., Cody, H., Ho, S., Gee, J.C., and Gerig,

G. User-Guided Level Set Segmentation of Anatomical Structures with ITK-SNAP. Insight Journal, Special Issue on ISC/NA-MIC/MICCAI Workshop on Open-Source Software, 2005.

NDI Polaris Vicra. Available at http://www.ndigital.com/.

Published

2024-05-13