Poverty Reduction and Pro-poorness Growth in Bihar and Jharkhand: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors

  • Jitendra Kumar Sinha

Keywords:

Poverty Measurement; Poverty Reduction; Pro-poor Growth; Poverty Alleviation Programs; Poverty Growth Curve; Inequality Elasticity of Growth; Pro-Poor Growth Index (PPGI).

Abstract

This study compares poverty reduction and pro-poorness of growth in rural and urban areas of Bihar, Jharkhand, and of all India. Bihar has recorded faster poverty reduction during 2004-05 and 2011-12 in compassion to Jharkhand and all-India. An increasing trend was witnessed in growth inequality at all Indian levels, but a reverse declining trend was witnessed in Bihar. Further, growth inequality has decreased in rural areas of Bihar and Jharkhand but increased in urban areas. The positive value of inequality elasticity at the all-India level simply implies that poverty alleviation programs did not adequately benefit poor people. The inequality elasticity was negative in both the rural and urban sectors of Bihar and the urban sector of Jharkhand implying that the lower strata have benefitted more than the upper-income group. A larger reduction in inequality in both rural and urban areas suggests that Bihar implemented more effective pro-poor programs than Jharkhand. Surprisingly, the inequality elasticity was positive in the rural sector of Jharkhand implying that programs did not benefit adequately rural people in Jharkhand. The poverty reduction impact on the growth of income measured by poverty elasticity of growth remains the same for both Bihar and Jharkhand. However, Bihar witnessed faster poverty reduction due to the effectiveness of anti-poverty measures and welfare spending, reflected by higher efficiency in reducing poverty in the decomposition of annual change in poverty.

References

Cappellari, L. & Jenkins, S.P. (2007), “Summarizing Multiple Deprivation Indicators,” In S. P. Jenkins and J. Micklewright (eds.), Inequality & Poverty Reexamined, New York: Oxford University Press, p. 166.

Krishna, A. and Shariff, A., 2010: The Irrelevance of National Strategies? Rural Poverty Dynamics in States and Regions of India, 1993–2005, World Development Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 533–549.

Datta, G & M.Ravallion(1998): Why Have Some States Done Better Than Others at Reducing Poverty, Economica, Vol.65 (257), pp.17-38.

Ravallion, M. & G. Datta (2002): Why has Economic Growth Been More Pro-poor in Some States Than Others?, Journal of Development Economics, Vol.68(2), pp.381-400.

Bandhopadhaya, K.R. (2007): Poverty Alleviation and Pro-poor growth in India, New Delhi, Asian Institute of Transport Development.

Thorat, S.& A. Dubey (2012): Has Growth Been Socially Inclusive during 1993-94 to 2009-10? Economic & Political Weekly, Vol. 47(10). Pp.43-53.

Ahluwalia, M.S.(2000): Economic Performance of States in Post-Reform Periods, Economic & Political Weekly, Vol.35(19), pp.37-48.

DeLong, J.B. (2012): India Since Independence: An Analytical Growth Narratives, Dani Rodrick(ed), In Search of Prosperity: Analytical Narratives in Economic growth, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, pp. 184-204.

Kumar, U. & A. Subramanium (2012): Growth in India’s States in the first Decade of the 21st Century: Four Facts, Economic & Political Weekly, Vol.47(3), pp.48-57.

Raju, S. (2012): Growth Across States in the 2000s: Evidence of Convergence, Economic & Political Weekly, Vol.47(23), pp.76-79.

Sinha, J.K.(2019): Influence of technologies on the growth rate of GDP from Agriculture: A case study of sustaining economic growth of agriculture sector in Bihar, Statistical Journal of IAOS, Vol.35, pp.277-287.

Sinha, J.K.(2022): Public Expenditure for Agricultural Development & Economic Growth of Bihar (1981-2019), Asian Journal of Economics & Finance, Vol.4(4), pp. 414-424.

Sinha, J.K. and Sinha A.K. (2022a): Syndrome of Declining Economic Importance of Agriculture in Bihar(1960 – 2018), Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 2022, 6(1).

Sinha, J.K. & A.K. Sinha (2022b): GROWTH ACCOUNTING ANALYSIS OF THE INDIAN ECONOMY – WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE ECONOMIES OF BIHAR & JHARKHAND DURING 2000-2021. International Journal of Applied Business and Management, Vol.3(1), pp.13-37.

Kakwani, N., and E.M.Pernia (2000): What is Pro-poor Growth? Asian Development Review, Vol.18(1), pp.1-16.

Kakwani, N., and H. Son(2008): Poverty Equivalent Growth Rate, Review of Income and Wealth, Vol 54; pp. 643-655.

Ravallion, M. & S. Chen (2003): Measuring Pro-poor Growth, Economic Letters, Vol. 78(1), pp.73-99.

Kakwani, N. and K Subbarao (1992), “Rural Poverty and its Alleviation in India: A. Discussion”, Economic and Political Weekly.

National Sample Survey Organization: Consumer Expenditure Survey 2004-05 (61st round), and 2011-12 (68th round).

Niti Aayog (2021): Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) Report, November 2021.

Planning Commission, India (Various Periodic Publications.)

Published

2023-08-08

How to Cite

Kumar Sinha, J. . (2023). Poverty Reduction and Pro-poorness Growth in Bihar and Jharkhand: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Advanced Research in Economics and Business Management, 6(1), 1-10. Retrieved from https://adrjournalshouse.com/index.php/Journal-Economics-BusinessMgt/article/view/1625