Unleashing Creativity and Innovativeness: Cross-Cultural Comparisons
Keywords:
Creativity, Innovativeness, Cultural Diversity, Lifeblood, CulturesAbstract
Creativity and innovativeness, intrinsic to human progress, are explored in-depth within this extensive review, emphasizing their interplay with culture. This comprehensive analysis investigates the multifaceted nature of creativity and innovativeness, dissecting their distinct definitions and roles in the creative and innovative processes. While creativity involves the generation of novel, valuable ideas, innovativeness encompasses the transformation of these ideas into tangible solutions, products, or services. This distinction forms the foundation upon which this review builds. Furthermore, the review delves into the profound impact of culture on these constructs, highlighting how cultural values, social norms, historical context, and educational systems shape creative and innovative endeavors. Understanding the intricate relationship between culture and creativity/innovativeness is essential for comprehending the variations and convergences that occur across diverse cultural landscapes. Moreover, this review delves into cross-cultural comparisons, utilizing case studies and empirical research to illustrate how creativity and innovativeness manifest differently worldwide. These cross-cultural insights illuminate the influence of cultural variables on the creative and innovative processes. Ultimately, this review culminates in a discussion of the practical implications for global businesses and innovation. It underscores the importance of embracing cultural diversity, building cross-cultural creative teams, and fostering innovation cultures that transcend borders in today's interconnected world.
References
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol.5). Sage.
West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology,51(3), 355-387.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Routledge.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, creativity synthesized. Cambridge University Press.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.
Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the US Patent Office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2-3), 97-106.
Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Advanced Research in Business Law and Technology Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
We, the undersigned, give an undertaking to the following effect with regard to our article entitled
“_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________” submitted for publication in (Journal title)________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________Vol.________, Year _________:-
1. The article mentioned above has not been published or submitted to or accepted for publication in any form, in any other journal.
2. We also vouchsafe that the authorship of this article will not be contested by anyone whose name(s) is/are not listed by us here.
3. I/We declare that I/We contributed significantly towards the research study i.e., (a) conception, design and/or analysis and interpretation of data and to (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and on (c) final approval of the version to be published.
4. I/We hereby acknowledge ADRs conflict of interest policy requirement to scrupulously avoid direct and indirect conflicts of interest and, accordingly, hereby agree to promptly inform the editor or editor's designee of any business, commercial, or other proprietary support, relationships, or interests that I/We may have which relate directly or indirectly to the subject of the work.
5. I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following sequence:-
Authors' Names (in sequence) Signature of Authors
1. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
2. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
3. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
4. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
5. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
6. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
7. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
8. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
Important
(I). All the authors are required to sign independently in this form in the sequence given above. In case an author has left the institution/ country and whose whereabouts are not known, the senior author may sign on his/ her behalf taking the responsibility.
(ii). No addition/ deletion/ or any change in the sequence of the authorship will be permissible at a later stage, without valid reasons and permission of the Editor.
(iii). If the authorship is contested at any stage, the article will be either returned or will not be
processed for publication till the issue is solved.
