Awareness Related to Digital Currencies And Central Bank Policies in India
Keywords:
Digital Rupee, public awareness, perception, adoption readiness, financial inclusion, digital payments, user behaviourAbstract
This study investigates public awareness, perception, and adoption readiness of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), specifically the Digital Rupee, in India. As global financial systems evolve, India’s push toward a sovereign-backed digital currency represents a
transformative leap in monetary policy, financial inclusion, and digital infrastructure. Using a structured questionnaire distributed online, the research surveyed 177 respondents across various age groups, occupations, and regions. The findings reveal high awareness (85.9%) but limited conceptual clarity, especially among older demographics. Younger respondents (18–25 years) demonstrated greater understanding and optimism regarding CBDC’s usability and potential to enhance financial inclusion. However, confusion persists between CBDC and decentralised cryptocurrencies, underscoring the need for targeted education.
Statistical analysis using SPSS confirmed significant relationships between age and variables such as understanding, perception, and willingness to adopt CBDC via popular payment apps. Trust in the Reserve Bank of India’s technological readiness was moderate, while concerns about data privacy and disruption to traditional banking were notable. The study identifies a
critical research gap in user-centric analysis of CBDC adoption, emphasising behavioural, infrastructural, and trust-related barriers. The research concludes that successful CBDC implementation in India requires inclusive design, robust cybersecurity, and strategic public communication. Integration with existing digital platforms and collaboration with fintech stakeholders can accelerate adoption. Ultimately, the Digital Rupee’s success will depend not only on technological efficiency but
also on its resonance with the diverse socio-economic realities of Indian citizens.
References
Bansal, A., Pophalkar, S., & Vidani, C. (2023). A Review of Ed-Tech Sector in India. International Journal of Management Analytics (IJMA), 1(1), 63-84.
Bariya, M., Vidani, J. (2023). Analyzing Market Share: A Comparative Study of LG and Samsung Electronics in Ahmedabad. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations. Retrieved from
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Advanced Research in Business Law and Technology Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
We, the undersigned, give an undertaking to the following effect with regard to our article entitled
“_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________” submitted for publication in (Journal title)________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________Vol.________, Year _________:-
1. The article mentioned above has not been published or submitted to or accepted for publication in any form, in any other journal.
2. We also vouchsafe that the authorship of this article will not be contested by anyone whose name(s) is/are not listed by us here.
3. I/We declare that I/We contributed significantly towards the research study i.e., (a) conception, design and/or analysis and interpretation of data and to (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and on (c) final approval of the version to be published.
4. I/We hereby acknowledge ADRs conflict of interest policy requirement to scrupulously avoid direct and indirect conflicts of interest and, accordingly, hereby agree to promptly inform the editor or editor's designee of any business, commercial, or other proprietary support, relationships, or interests that I/We may have which relate directly or indirectly to the subject of the work.
5. I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following sequence:-
Authors' Names (in sequence) Signature of Authors
1. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
2. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
3. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
4. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
5. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
6. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
7. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
8. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
Important
(I). All the authors are required to sign independently in this form in the sequence given above. In case an author has left the institution/ country and whose whereabouts are not known, the senior author may sign on his/ her behalf taking the responsibility.
(ii). No addition/ deletion/ or any change in the sequence of the authorship will be permissible at a later stage, without valid reasons and permission of the Editor.
(iii). If the authorship is contested at any stage, the article will be either returned or will not be
processed for publication till the issue is solved.