Seismic Analysis of G+15 RCC Building Frames: A Comparative Study with and without Masonry Infill Walls - A Review

Authors

  • Sayed Mohammad Amir M. tech Students Department of Building Engineering and Construction Management, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh.
  • Muhammad Raafik M. tech Students Department of Building Engineering and Construction Management, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh.

Keywords:

G 15, Bare, Infill, Story Drift, Base Shear, Time Period, Natural Frequency

Abstract

In regions like India where seismic activity is prone, reinforced concrete
frames with masonry infill walls are a prevalent practise. Masonry
infill walls are typically treated as nonstructural elements in structural
analysis, only their mass contribution is taken into account. Their
structural characteristics, such as strength and stiffness, are typically
ignored. Structures in seismically active regions are particularly
susceptible to catastrophic damage. A structure must endure lateral
loads that could cause severe strains in addition to gravity force.
Reinforced concrete frames are still the most widely used in building
construction today. It is known as a brick infill wall or panel when brick
or masonry is used to cover the vertical space left by the columns and
beams in reinforced concrete frames. In this study, diagonal strut will
take the role of the infill walls, analysis will be done. contrasting the
outcomes of the computerised model study for constructions made of
G+ 15 that have and don’t have infill. For the purposes of comparison,
we examine the results for base shear, lateral floor displacement, story
drift by buildings.

References

P.M.Pradhan, P.L.Pradhan, R.K.Maskey “Kathmandu University Journal of Sciences, Engineering and Technology, Vol.8 No I, February 2012, Pp 142-152.

B.Srinavas and B.K.Raghu Prasad “The Influence of Masonry in RC Multistory Buildings to Near- Fault Ground Motions” Journal of International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE) 2009, PP 240-248.

Mulgund G.V “Seismic Assessments of RC Frame Buildings with Brick Masonry Infills” International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Technologies, Vol No.2 Issue No.2, 140-147(2011).

P.G.Asteris “Lateral Stiffness of Brick Masonry Infilled Plane Frames” Journal of Structural Engineering” ASCE (2003).

Diptesh Das and C.V.R.Murty “Brick masonry infills in seismic design of RC framed buildings” Part 1- Cost implifications, The Indian Concrete Journal (2004).

Siamak Sattar and Abbic B.Liel “Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures With and Without Masonry Infill Walls” University of Colorado, Boulder.

V.K.R.Kodur, M.A.Erki and J.H.P.Quenneville “Seismic analysis of infilled frames” Journal of Structural Engineering Vol.25, No.2, July 1998 PP 95-102.

P. G. Asteris, 2003, M.ASCE, Lateral Stiffness of Brick Masonry In filled Plane Frames, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.129, No.8, August1, 2003.ASCE, ISSN0733-9445/2003/8-1071±1079.

Mehmet Metin Kose “Parameters affecting the fundamental period of RC buildings with infill walls” Engineering Structures 31 (2009), 93-102.

Jaswant N.Arlekar, Sudhir K.Jain, C.V.R.Murty “Seismic Response of Frame Buildings with Soft First Storeys” Proceedings of the CBRI Golden Jubilee Conference on Natural Hazards in Urban Habitat, 1997 New Delhi.

Published

2023-08-08