Security Measures in Cellular Aided Mobile Ad hoc Network (CAMA)
Keywords:
Cellular Network, Wireless Security, Manets, Key Management Scheme, Ad hoc NetworkAbstract
In this paper we present a novel infrastructure of Cellular-Aided Mobile Ad hoc Network (CAMA) with the security issues and the corresponding solutions are addressed. The experimental study shows that CAMA is much less vulnerable than a pure ad hoc network. We discuss these challenges and outline some possible solutions.In this paper we present a novel infrastructure ofcellular-aided mobile ad-hoc network (CAMA)withthe security issues and the corresponding solutions are addressed. The experimental study shows that CAMA is much less vulnerable than a pure ad hoc network. We discuss thesechallenges and outline some possible solutions
References
1. Chakrabarti S, Mishra A. Qos issues in ad hoc wireless networks. IEEE Personal Communication Magazine. Feb 2001; 142-148.
2. Lu Y, Bhargava B. Achieving scalability and flexibility: A new architecture for wireless network. In Proceedings of Conference on Internet Computing. 2001.
3. Marti S, Giuli T, Lai K et al. Mitigating routing misbehavior in mobile wireless networks. In Proceedings of Mobico. 2000.
4. Myrick W, Zoltowski MD, Goldstein JS. Low-sample performance of reduced-rank power minimization based jammer suppression for gps. In IEEE Sixth International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques& Applications (ISSSTA 2000). Aug 2000.
5. Myrick W, Zoltowski MD, Goldstein JS. Adaptive antijam reduced-rank space-time preprocessor algorithms for gps. In Institute of Navigation (ION) Conference, Sept 2000.
6. Pahlavan K, Krishnamurthy P, Hatami A et al. Handoff in hybrid mobile data networks. IEEE Personal Communications. Apr 2000.
7. Navstargps operation. Web site at http://tycho.usno. navy.mil/gpsinfo.html.
8. Albers P, Camp O, Percher JM et al. Security in ad hoc networks: a general intrusion detection architecture enhancing trust based approaches. Web site at www. supelecrennes.fr/ren/perso/bjouga/ documents/.
9. Asokan N, Ginzboorg P. Key agreement in ad-hoc network. Web site at www.cs.umd.edu/ sengcy/classes/ 818y.
2. Lu Y, Bhargava B. Achieving scalability and flexibility: A new architecture for wireless network. In Proceedings of Conference on Internet Computing. 2001.
3. Marti S, Giuli T, Lai K et al. Mitigating routing misbehavior in mobile wireless networks. In Proceedings of Mobico. 2000.
4. Myrick W, Zoltowski MD, Goldstein JS. Low-sample performance of reduced-rank power minimization based jammer suppression for gps. In IEEE Sixth International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques& Applications (ISSSTA 2000). Aug 2000.
5. Myrick W, Zoltowski MD, Goldstein JS. Adaptive antijam reduced-rank space-time preprocessor algorithms for gps. In Institute of Navigation (ION) Conference, Sept 2000.
6. Pahlavan K, Krishnamurthy P, Hatami A et al. Handoff in hybrid mobile data networks. IEEE Personal Communications. Apr 2000.
7. Navstargps operation. Web site at http://tycho.usno. navy.mil/gpsinfo.html.
8. Albers P, Camp O, Percher JM et al. Security in ad hoc networks: a general intrusion detection architecture enhancing trust based approaches. Web site at www. supelecrennes.fr/ren/perso/bjouga/ documents/.
9. Asokan N, Ginzboorg P. Key agreement in ad-hoc network. Web site at www.cs.umd.edu/ sengcy/classes/ 818y.
Published
2018-12-25
Issue
Section
Research Article
