Revitalizing Development and Business Models for Inclusive Growth

Authors

  • Gourav Singh Department of Management, Chathamkulam Knowdge Park, Palakkad, Kerala, India.

Keywords:

Sustainable Development, Policy, Business Model, Economic Planning, Inclusive Growth

Abstract

This conceptual paper explores the intricate relationship between economic and political philosophies and the evolution of business models. It delves into the challenges posed by the current business models, analyzing their impact on inclusive growth. This paper advocates for a humanitarian approach in developmental planning, emphasizing the need for a delicate balance between economic priorities and societal well-being. The introduction sets the stage for an exploration of the symbiotic relationship between the developmental model and the evolving business paradigm. It underscores the challenges embedded in the present business model, calling for a holistic reevaluation that transcends economic considerations and incorporates societal and environmental imperatives. The subsequent section delves into the historical evolution of business models, elucidating how economic and political ideologies shape prevailing paradigms. From mercantilism to the neoclassical synthesis, each phase reflects the interplay between political ideologies and business dimensions, influencing societal structures. The paper then shifts focus to contemporary challenges in sustainable development, emphasizing issues such as freshwater depletion, industrial pollution, climate change, social disparities, overconsumption, loss of biodiversity, and unsustainable agricultural practices. It underscores the urgency for a paradigm shift in economic, political, and social systems to foster collaboration for a resilient and harmonious future. Identifying challenges within the present business model, the subsequent section discusses inappropriate marketing, packaging, financial, and advertising practices, along with issues of employee discontent, environmental neglect, and a lack of concern for the future. The exploration of an alternative business model takes center stage in the final section, presenting evolving ideas such as relative economics, the Gandhian developmental model, Chinmaya Vision, and the concept of a green economy. In conclusion, the paper posits that as businesses continue to evolve, the adoption of alternative models offers a promising avenue for a more sustainable, inclusive, and harmonious future. It underscores the need for further research and practical implementations to reshape the business landscape toward a more equitable and resilient world.

References

Sen, A. (2014). Development as freedom (1999). The globalization and development reader: Perspectives on development and global change, 525.

Antara, M. Inequlity of Economic Development Between Districts in Bali Province.

Sachs, J. D. (2006). The end of poverty: Economic possibilities for our time. Penguin.

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2013). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Currency.

Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress.

Conceição, P. (2023). Human Development Report 2020-The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene. In Human Development Report 2020-The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene: Conceicao, Pedro. [Sl]: SSRN.

Easterly, W. R. (2002). The elusive quest for growth: economists' adventures and misadventures in the tropics. MIT press.

Rodrik, D. (2007). One economics, many recipes: globalization, institutions, and economic growth. Princeton university press.

World Bank. (2019). World development report 2020: Trading for development in the age of global value chains. The World Bank.

Moyo, D. (2009). Dead aid: Why aid is not working and how there is a better way for Africa. Macmillan.

Krugman, P. R. (1994). Peddling prosperity: Economic sense and nonsense in the age of diminished expectations. WW Norton & Company.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance.

Sachs, J. D., & McArthur, J. W. (2005). The millennium project: a plan for meeting the millennium development goals. The Lancet, 365(9456), 347-353.

Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2005). Unbundling institutions. Journal of political Economy, 113(5), 949-995.

Chandler, A. D., Hikino, T., & Chandler, A. D. (2009). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Harvard University Press.

Heilbroner, R. L., & Milberg, W. (2012). Th e making of economic society. Pearson Education Company.

Landes, D. S. (2015). Wealth and poverty of nations. Hachette UK.

Tsoulfidis, L., & Tsoulfidis, L. (2009). Karl Marx’s Das Kapital. Competing Schools of Economic Thought, 85-131.

Caldwell, B. (2020). The Road to Serfdom after 75 years. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(3), 720-748.

Friedman, M. (2016). Capitalism and freedom. In Democracy: a reader (pp. 344-349). Columbia University Press.

Keynes, J. M. (1937). The general theory of employment. The quarterly journal of economics, 51(2), 209-223.

Guinchard, P. (1949). Economics: An Introductory Analysis.

Hicks, J. R. (1975). Value and capital: An inquiry into some fundamental principles of economic theory. OUP Catalogue.

Krugman, P. R., & Wells, R. (2009). Economics. Macmillan.

Schumpeter, J. A. (2013). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. routledge.

Galbraith, J. K. (1998). The affluent society. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Stiglitz, J. (2016). Globalization and its new discontents. Project Syndicate, 5(8), 2-3.

Coase, R. H. (1995). The nature of the firm (pp. 37-54). Macmillan Education UK.

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., ... & Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. nature, 461(7263), 472-475.

Almond, R. E. A., Grooten, M., & Petersen, T. (2021). Living planet report 2020-bending the curve of biodiversity loss. Natural Resources & Environment, 35(3), 62-62.

Nations, U. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

Franco, E. G., Kuritzky, M., Lukacs, R., & Zahidi, S. (2020, January). The global risks report 2020. In World Economic Forum.

Conceição, P. (2023). Human Development Report 2020-The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene. In Human Development Report 2020-The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene: Conceicao, Pedro. [Sl]: SSRN.

Assessment, M. E. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being (Vol. 5, p. 563). Island Press, Washington, DC.

Berkhout, E., Galasso, N., Lawson, M., Rivero Morales, P. A., Taneja, A., & Vázquez Pimentel, D. A. (2021). The Inequality Virus: Bringing together a world torn apart by coronavirus through a fair, just and sustainable economy.

Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.

Porter, G., Townsend, J., & Hampshire, K. (Eds.). (2020). Children and Young People as Knowledge Producers. Routledge.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of management review, 26(1), 117-127.

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, 4(4), 497-505.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review, 84(12), 78-92.

Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M. J. (2001). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance drivers. Long range planning, 34(5), 585-604.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?. Strategic management journal, 21(5), 603-609.

Elkington, J. (1997). The triple bottom line for 21st century business. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136.

Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The business case for corporate sustainability:: literature review and research options. European management journal, 23(1), 27-36.

Published

2023-12-21

How to Cite

Singh, G. . (2023). Revitalizing Development and Business Models for Inclusive Growth. Journal of Advanced Research in Quality Control & Management, 8(2), 23-30. Retrieved from https://adrjournalshouse.com/index.php/Journal-QualityControl-Mgt/article/view/1843