Exploring the Depths of Qualitative Research in Services
Keywords:
Qualitative Research, Service Sector, Sustainability, Data Management, Ethical Considerations, Resource IntensityAbstract
Qualitative research in services has evolved into a vital and adaptable approach for comprehending the intricacies of the service industry. This comprehensive review explores its historical development, methodologies, strengths, and limitations, underscoring its significance in gaining holistic insights into diverse service sectors. Tracing its roots back to the mid-20th century, qualitative research in services has matured through the pioneering work of scholars like Robert K. Yin and Barney G. Glaser. It encompasses an array of methodologies, including interviews, focus groups, participant observation, content analysis, and case studies, each tailored to delve into specific aspects of service provision and consumption. The strengths of qualitative research in services lie in its capacity to provide rich, contextually relevant data, contribute to theory development, offer flexibility in research design, and consider the perspectives of multiple stakeholders. However, it is not without limitations, including potential subjectivity, resource intensity, challenges in data management, and ethical considerations. Recent trends reflect the ever-changing service landscape, with digital ethnography, customer journey mapping, service design thinking, mixed-methods approaches, and a focus on sustainability and ethical consumption emerging as prominent themes. In conclusion, qualitative research in services remains indispensable for unraveling the complexities of the service sector, offering a profound understanding of service experiences, organizational practices, and customer interactions. Its adaptability and enduring relevance ensure its continued contribution to innovation and improved service quality in an evolving world.
References
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
Heskett, J. L., Jones, T. O., Loveman, G. W., Sasser, W. E., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1997). Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 164-174.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage publications.
Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in management research. Sage publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage publications.
Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage publications.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage publications.
Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Sage.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage publications.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 Atishay Jain
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
