Review Article



Customer perceived value,Customer citizenship behaviour,Customer satisfaction


With the increasing involvement of customers at restaurants, their behaviors have become an indispensable part in the formation of perceptions of value. To examine such a subtle and complicated process, this study applies a multi-layer/multi-dimension approach to examine how customer behavior predicts perceived value, which in turn leads to satisfaction. Particularly, customer behavior, assessed with a hierarchical framework, includes two dimensions: participation behavior (with four sub-dimensions: information seeking, information sharing, responsible behavior, personal interaction) and citizenship behavior (with four sub-dimensions: feedback, advocacy, helping, and tolerance). Customer perceived value consists of three dimensions: economic, individual, and relational values. Data collected from 514 respondents reflect those with a dining experience at restaurants. The results show that a customer’s perception of value gains a greater impact on citizenship behavior than participation behavior. The findings of the study contribute to the evolving knowledge of customer behavior and offer industry practitioners’ effective marketing strategies to maximize customer value.


1. Levy, M. Revolutionizing the retail pricing game. Discount Store News, 15 September 1999.
2. Sweeney, J.; Soutar, G. Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. J. Retail. 2001,77, 203–220.
3. Rintamäki, T.; Kanto, A.; Kuusela, H.; Spence, M.T. Decomposing the value of department store shopping
into utilitarian, hedonic and social dimensions. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2006, 34, 6–24.
4. Jensen, H.R. The interrelationship between customer and consumer value. Asia Pac. Adv. Consum. Res. 1996,2, 60–63.
5. Ostrom, A.; Iacobucci, D. Consumer trade-o_s and the evaluation of services. J. Mark. 1995, 59, 17–28.
6. Oh, H. The E_ect of Brand Class, Brand Awareness, and Price on Customer Value and Behavioral Intentions.J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2000, 24, 136–162.
7. Jeng, S.-P. The influences of airline brand credibility on consumer purchase intentions. J. Air Transp. Manag.2016, 55, 1–8.
8. An, J.; Do, D.K.X.; Ngo, L.V.; Quan, T.H.M. Turning brand credibility into positive word-of-mouth: Integrating the signaling and social identity perspectives. J. Brand Manag. 2018, 26, 157–175.
9. Hwang, J.; Lee, J. Antecedents and consequences of brand prestige of package tour in the senior tourism industry. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2019, 24, 679–695.
10. Jin, N.; Lee, S.; Jun, J.-H. The role of brand credibility in predicting consumers’ behavioural intentions in luxury restaurants. Anatolia 2014, 26, 384–396.
11. Kim, S.; Ham, S.; Moon, H.; Chua, B.-L.; Han, H. Experience, brand prestige, perceived value (functional, hedonic, social, and financial), and loyalty among GROCERANT customers. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 77, 169–177.
12. Erdem, T.; Swait, J. Brand Credibility, Brand Consideration, and Choice. J. Consum. Res. 2004, 31, 191–198.
13. Baek, T.H.; Kim, J.; Yu, J.H. The di_erential roles of brand credibility and brand prestige in consumer brand choice. Psychol. Mark. 2010, 27, 662–678.
14. Fournier, S. Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research. J. Consum. Res. 1998, 24, 343–353.
15. Smith, D.C.; Aaker, D.A. Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. J. Mark. 1992,56, 125
16. Chaudhuri, A.; Holbrook, M.B. The Chain of E_ects from Brand Trust and Brand A_ect to Brand Performance:The Role of Brand Loyalty. J. Mark. 2001, 65, 81–93.
17. Dick, A.S.; Basu, K. Customer Loyalty: Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework. J. Acad. Mark. Sci.1994, 22, 99–113.
18. Zeithmal, V.A. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. 1988, 52, 2–22.
19. Babin, B.J.; Darden, W.R.; Gri_n, M. Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value.
J. Consum. Res. 1994, 20, 644. [CrossRef]
20. Gronross, C. From marketing mix to relationship marketing towards a paradigm shift in marketing.
Manag. Decis. 1997, 35, 322–340. [CrossRef]