An Introduction to Media
Keywords:
Mass Communication, intra-personal, acta diurnaAbstract
Mass Communication includes correspondence with the mass crowds and subsequently the name Mass Communication. At the point when we are thinking, it is intra-individual correspondence, when there is vis-à-vis discussion between two individuals it is relational correspondence, school talk or discourse would be an illustration of gathering correspondence, however there is another degree of correspondence when we read papers, magazines, tune in to Radio or stare at the TV. This would be called 'Mass Communication ' as the message is reached to the majority through various media.
How to cite this article:
Gupta P. An Introduction to Media. J Adv Res Jrnl Mass Comm 2020; 7(4): 4-5.
References
Gerbner, G. (1969). 'Towards Cultural Indicators: The Analysis of Mass Mediated Public Message System', AV Communication Review 17, 137-48.
Halloran, J.D. (1982). 'The Context of Mass Communication Research' 163-205 in D. Charles Whitney and E. Wartella (eds.), Mass Communication Review Yearbook. Beverly Hills London: Sage Publications.
Hamelink, C.J. (1989). 'The Relationship between Cultural Identity and Modes of Communication', 417-26 in J.A. Anderson (ed.), Communication Yearbook. London: Sage Publications.
Kosicki, G.M. and J.M. McLeod (1990). 'Learning from Political News: Effects of Media Images and Information Processing Strategies', 69-83 in S. Kraus(ed.), Mass Communication and Political Information Processing. Hillsdale,NJ: LEA.
Khan, F.R., A.S. Abbasi, M.N. Mahsud, A.U. Kettikhel and H.A. Zafar (1994).'Press and the Phenomenon of Sindhi-Mohajir Ethnicity: Exploring Effects of Newspapers'. Unpublished paper.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The Savage Mind. London: Hollymm.Levy, M. and S. Windahl (1984). 'Audience Activity and Gratifications: A Conceptual Clarification and Exploration', Communication Research 11, 51-78.
McLeod, J.M., Carl R. Bybee and Jean A. Durall (1979). 'Equivalence of Informed Political Participation: The 1976 Presidential Debates as a Source of influence', Communication Research 6(4), 463-87
