Group Dynamics: Elements of Powerful Correspondence
Keywords:
Gathering elements, objective, Group dynamicsAbstract
A gathering can be characterized as a few people who meet up to achieve a specific errand or objective. Gathering elements alludes to the attitudinal and conduct qualities of a gathering. Gathering elements concern how gathering’s structure, their design and interaction, and how they work. Gathering elements are applicable in both formal and casual gatherings, everything being equal. In a hierarchical setting, bunches are an exceptionally normal authoritative element and the investigation of gatherings and gathering elements is a significant territory of study in authoritative conduct.
The accompanying areas give data identified with bunch elements. In particular, the arrangement and advancement of gatherings is first thought of. At that point some significant kinds or characterizations of gatherings are talked about. At that point the design of gatherings is analyzed.
How to cite this article:
Rajput SS. Group Dynamics: Elements of Powerful Correspondence. J Adv Res Jrnl Mass Comm 2020; 7(4): 12-14.
References
Gaertner, S. L.; Dovidio, J. F.; Banker, B. S.; Houlette, M.; Johnson, K. M.; McGlynn, E. A. (2000). "Reducing intergroup conflict: From superordinate goals to recategorization, recategorization, and mutual differentiation". Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 4: 98–114. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.98
Bohrnstedt, George W.; Fisher, Gene A. (1986). "The Effects of Recalled Childhood and Adolescent Relationships Compared to Current Role Performances on Young Adults' Affective Functioning". Social Psychology Quarterly. 49 (1): 19–32. doi:10.2307/2786854. JSTOR 2786854
Pinto, I. R.; Marques, J. M.; Abrams, D. (2010). "Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the black sheep effect?". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 99 (1): 107–119. doi:10.1037/a0018187. PMID 20565188
Marques, J. M.; Abrams, D.; Paez, D.; Taboada, C. (1998). "The role of categorization and ingroup norms in judgments of groups and their members". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 75(4): 976–988. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.976
J. Richard Hackman (2002). Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. Harvard Business Press.
Porter, C. O. L. H. (2005). Goal orientation: Effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 811–818.
Price, K. H., Harrison, D. A., & Gavin, J. H. (2006). Withholding inputs in team contexts: Member composition, interaction processes, evaluation structure, and social loafing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1375–1384.
Tasa, K., Taggar, S., & Seijts, G. H. (2007). The development of collective efficacy in teams: A multilevel and longitudinal perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 17–27.
Haslam, N; Rothschild, L; Ernst, D (2002). "Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice?". British Journal of Social Psychology. 41(1): 87–100. doi:10.1348/014466602165072. PMID 11970776
Fischer, Michael Daniel; Ferlie, Ewan (1 January 2013). "Resisting hybridisation between modes of clinical risk management: Contradiction, contest, and the production of intractable conflict"(PDF). Accounting, Organizations and Society. 38 (1): 30–49. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2012.11.002
Aronson, Elliot (1997). The Jigsaw Classroom. New York: Longman. ISBN 978-0-673-99383-0.
McAdams, Dan P.; Constantian, Carol A. (1983). "Intimacy and affiliation motives in daily living: An experience sampling analysis". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 45 (4): 851–861. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.851
