A Critical Analysis of the Literature Regarding Cyber-Violence and Social Media Awareness in the Context of Teacher Education
Keywords:
Cyber-Violence, Social Media, Teacher Education, TwitterAbstract
The extended plans are supported by multilateral and new literary literacy teachings, which place a greater emphasis on the technology of developing technologies in educational settings. However, there is no controversy within the education field about the ethical repercussions that may result from the use of social media in the teacher. The fact that the area on the internet is likely to be hazardous is something that should be of particular concern. In particular, the social networking tool known as Twitter, which is utilized and encouraged by many teachers to work on professional learning networks, is rife with inappropriate conduct and racist abuse.
The present paper will explain the ethical consequences for teachers who develop an academic to develop important social media awareness activities by conducting a review of existing research on the use of social media in teaching and taking a multi-disciplinary approach to issues relating to cyber-violence. This will be done through the medium of writing. Employ Twitter as a useful tool. Want to put these methods to practice and create more of them.
References
Carnerero AC, Azeez AH. Islamonausea, not Islamophobia’: The many faces of cyber hate speech. Journal of Arab & Muslim media research 2016; 9(1): 21-40.
Allen R. Recruiting and Retaining Teachers of Color, 2020.
Weiser BS, Miltner KM. MasculinitySoFragile: Culture, structure and networked misogyny. Feminist Media Studies 2016; 16(1): 171-174.
Bardzell S. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing system, 2010.
Benko S, Guise M, Earl C et al. More than social media: Using Twitter with preservice teachers as a means of reflection and engagement in communities of practice. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 2016; 16(1): 1-21.
Berson IR, Berson MJ, Ferron J et al. Emerging risks of violence in the digital age: Lessons for educators from an online study of adolescent girls in the United States. Journal of School Violence 2002; 1(2) 51-71.
Brahnam S, Karanikas M, Weaver M. Udressing the interface: Exposing the foundational HCI metaphor “computer is woman”. Interacting with Computers, 2011; 23(5): 401-412.
Carpenter JP, Krutka DG. Engagement through microblogging: Educator professional development via Twitter. Professional development in education 2015; 41(4): 707-728.
Carpenter JP, Cook MP, Morrison SA et al. Why haven’t I tried Twitter until now?: Using Twitter in teacher education. Learning Landscapes 2017; 11(1): 51-64.
Carpenter JP, Tur G, Marín VI. What do US and Spanish pre-service teachers think about educational and professional use of Twitter? A comparative study. Teaching and Teacher Education 2016; 60: 131-143.
Carter AM. Teaching with trauma: Trigger warnings, feminism and disability pedagogy. Disability Studies Quarterly 2015; 35(2): 1-21.
Cervetti G, Damico J, Pearson PD. Multiple literacies, new literacies and teacher education. Theory into Practice 2006; 45(4): 378-386.
Collier S, Foley B, Moguel D et al. Write for your life: Developing digital literacies and writing pedagogy in teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 2013; 13(3): 262-284.
Cope B, Kalantzis M. Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An international Journal 2009; 4(3): 164-195.
Friesen N, Lowe S. The questionable promise of social media for education: Connective learning and the commercial imperative. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2012; 28(3): 183-194.
Godderis R, Root JL. Trigger warnings: Compassion is not censorship. Radical Pedagogy 2016; 13(2): 130-138.
Greenhow C, Gleason B. Twitteracy: Tweeting as a new literacy practice. The Educational Forum 2012; 76(4): 464-478.
Hanewald, R. Confronting the pedagogical challenge of cyber safety. Australian Journal for Teacher Education 2008; 33(3): 1-16.
Holmes K, Preston G, Shaw K et al. Follow Me: Networked Professional Learning for Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 2013; 38(12): 12.
Jane EA. Back to the kitchen, cunt’: speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny. Continuum 2014; 28(4): 558-570.
Jane EA. Online misogyny and feminist digilantism. Continuum 2016; 30(3): 284-297.
Florencio J (Oct, 2016) Why I won’t be issuing trigger warnings to students 2020.
Kalantzis M, Cope B. The teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the new media age. E-learning and Digital Media 2010; 7(3): 200-222.
Kimmons R, Veletsianos G. Teacher professionalization in the age of social networking sites. Learning, Media and Technology 2015; 40(4): 480-501.
Knobel M, Lankshear C. Studying new literacies. Journal of adolescent & adult literacy 2014; 58(2): 97-101.
Krutka DG, Nowell S, Whitlock AM et al. Towards a social media pedagogy: Successes and shortcomings in educative uses of Twitter with teacher candidates. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 2017; 25(2): 215-240.
Lewis R, Rowe M, Wiper C. Online abuse of feminists as an emerging form of violence against women and girls. British journal of criminology 2017; 57(6): 1462-1481.
Nagle J. Twitter, cyber-violence and the need for a critical social media literacy in teacher education: A review of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education 2018; 76: 86-94.
Oksanen A, Hawdon J, Holkeri E et al. Exposure to online hate among young social media users. In Soul of society: A focus on the lives of children & youth. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2014.
Preston JP, Jakubiec BA, Jones J et al. Twitter in a Bachelor of Education course: Student experiences. Learing Landscapes 2015; 8(2): 301-317.
The New London Group. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard educational review 1996; 66(1): 60-93.
Veletsianos G, Hodson J. Social Media as a Weapon to Harass Women Academics, 2018.
Whittaker E, Kowalski RM. Cyberbullying via social media. Journal of School Violence 2015; 14(1): 11-29.
Zembylas M. Pedagogy of discomfort’and its ethical implications: The tensions of ethical violence in social justice education. Ethics and Education 2015; 10(2): 163-34.
Zembylas M, Vrasidas C. Globalization, information and communication technologies and the prospect of a ‘global village’: promises of inclusion or electronic colonization?. Journal of Curriculum Studies 2005; 37(1): 65-83.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Advanced Research in Journalism & Mass Communication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.