Impact of Aerobic Treatment with presence of PVC Media in treating of Dairy Waste Water

Authors

  • R. Gobinath Under graduate student, Department of Civil Engineering, Jay Shriram Group of Institutions, Tirupur, India
  • Eldho Issac Dias Under graduate students, Department of Civil engineering, Jay Shriram Group of Institutions, Tirupur,India
  • Riju Saji Under graduate student, Department of Civil Engineering, Jay Shriram Group of Institutions, Tirupur, India
  • E. Jeevanantham Under graduate student, Department of Civil Engineering, Jay Shriram Group of Institutions, Tirupur, India
  • S. Krishnaviraj Under graduate student, Department of Civil Engineering, Jay Shriram Group of Institutions, Tirupur, India
  • T. Narmatha Under graduate student, Department of Civil Engineering, Jay Shriram Group of Institutions, Tirupur, India

Keywords:

Dairy Waste, MSBR, COD, BOD, PVC ring mediaq

Abstract

In any dairy plant, the quantity and characteristics of effluent is depending upon the extent of production activities, pasteurization to several milk products. In the advent of modernization, pollution problems have also emerged in various forms. Effluent treatment involving biodegradable organic wastes can be treated biologically in most cases. Activated sludge process is used in the studies. A bench scale modified sequential batch reactor is established (MSBR) consist of an inlet which is directed to a feed pump having capacity of 2L per hour. The aerobic environment in the reactor is achieved by diffused or mechanical aeration. The efficiency in removal of COD, BOD, and other parameters are checked for 24, 48 and 72 hours respectively. The ammonia removal efficiency of MSBR is 75%. The BOD removal efficiency of MSBR in presence of PVC media is 69%, COD removal efficiency is 68% . Thus the work implies that the application of PVC ring media in the treatment of dairy waste increases the treating efficiency of MSBR

References

1. Wildbrett G. Dairy plant ef?uent: Nature of pollutants. In: Roginski H et al. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences. Elsevier, Oxford 2002: 727–33.
2. Vidal G, Carvalho A, M´endez R et al. Influence of the content in fats and proteins on the anaerobic biodegradability of dairy wastewaters. Biore- sour Tech 2000; 74: 231– 39. S
3. Munavlli GR, Saler PS. Treatment of dairy wastewater by water hyacinth. Water Sci Tech 2009; 59: 713–22.
4. Janczukowicz W, Zieli´nski M, Debowski M. Biodegradability evaluation of dairy ef?uents originated in selected sections of dairy production. Biore- sour Tech 2008; 99: 4199– 205.
5. Vourch M, Balannec B, Chaufer B et al. Treatment of dairy industry wastewater by reverse osmosis for water reuse. Desalination 2008; 219: 190–202.
6. Bielefeldt AR. Water treatment, industrial. In: Schaechter M et al. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Microbiol- ogy, 3rd ed., Academic Press, Oxford, 2009: 569–86.
7. Stover EL, Campana CK. Ef?uents from food processing: On-site processing of waste. In: Caballero B et al. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 2nd ed., Academic Press, Oxford, 2003: 1968–76.
8. Irvine RL, Ketchum LH Jr, Breyfogle RE et al. Municipal application of sequencing batch treatment at Culver, Indiana. J Water Pollut Control Fed 1983; 55: 484.
9. Irvine RL. Applications of Sequencing Batch Reactors for Treatment of Municipal and Industrial Wastewaters, Research Grant, National Science Foundation’s Program of Research Applied to National Needs, July 1976 to April 1979.
10. Alleman JE, Irvine RL. Nitrification in the sequencing batch biological reactor. J Water Pollut Control Fed 1980; 53: 2747.
11. Kushwaha JP, Srivastava VC, Mall ID. An Overview of Various Technologies for the Treatment of Dairy Wastewaters. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2011; 51: 442– 52.
12. Iordache S, Iordan M, Necula C. Treatment process simulation of waste water from a dairy plant using computer software package. Annals Food Science & Tech 2009; 10(1): 207-12.
13. Kaseva M. Performance of a subsurface flow constructed wet land in polishing pre-treated wastewater, a tropical case study. Water Research 2003; 38: 681-87.

Published

2018-12-24