Optimizing Pedestrian Accessibility: A Comprehensive Analysis of Factors Influencing Walking Distances to Preferred Public Transport Bus Stops

Authors

  • Pramila Rajchal Lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering, Khwopa Polytechnic Institute, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
  • Raju bhele Lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
  • Rajesh Khadka Assistant Professor, Center for Post Graduates Studies, Nepal Engineering College, Bhaktapur, Nepal.

Keywords:

Public transport stops, Pedestrian behavior, willingness to walk, walking time, regression models.

Abstract

In urban planning, environmental sustainability, and transportation planning, the ability to walk to a bus stop is crucial.  This study explores the complex relationship between walkability factors and societal influences on pedestrian behavior. It uses a multidisciplinary approach in recognition of the importance of public transportation nodes and the critical role that walkability plays in shaping towns and cities. Observational studies, questionnaire surveys are methods used to study pedestrian accessibility to public bus stops. The results showed complex interactions among environmental, social, and infrastructural elements and highlight how pedestrian decisions are dynamic and how transportation infrastructure affects community mobility. Age, gender, walking distance, education, trip purpose and cleanliness of bus stop have significant impact willingness to walk to nearest bus stop.

 

The willingness to walk in term of distance at present and future condition were studied it was observed that if the existing infrastructure improved they showed their willing to walk in average minimum 476.32 meter and 1670.27 meter in maximum. It was observed that the bus stop at rural area have greater service coverage area But in the case of the bus stops at urban area, buses users have more option in the case of selection of bus stop for trip. As a result, it was observed that urban bus have small service coverage area in the comparison the rural bus stop. The regression models were developed at 95% confidence level and it was observed to be statistically significant at 95% confidence level based on the R2 F-statistic. The findings, highlights the necessity of modified urban planning initiatives to improve walkability and maximize the layout of public transportation stops. Conclusively, this research provides significant perspectives to the domains of urban sociology and transportation studies, providing a comprehensive understanding of the societal factors influencing pedestrian behavior and the critical role of comprehensive bus stop accessibility assessments in sustainable urban development.

References

Tennoy A, Knapskog M, Wolday F. Walking distances to public transport in smaller and larger Norwegian cities. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 2022;103:103169.

Prasad NR. Public transportation for Portland commuter. 2022;7(2):108-13.

World Health Organization. Health and sustainable development. Strategies for healthy, sustainable transport. 2019.

Pandey A, Lehe L, Monzer D. Distribution of bus stop spacing in the United States. Transp Findings. 2021.

Nur NA, Mohamad D, Ahmad HH. Acceptable walking distance accessible to the nearest bus stop considering the service coverage. International Congress of Advanced Technology and Engineering; 2021. p. 1-7.

Gahlot V, Swami BL, Prida M, Kalla P. Availability and accessibility assessment of public transit system in Jaipur city. Int J Transp Eng. 2013;1:2.

Kim J, Kim J, Jun M, Kho S. Determination of a bus service coverage area reflecting passenger attributes. J Eastern Asia Soc Transp Stud. 2005;6:529-43.

Ebolia L, Forcinitia C, Mazzullaa G. Service coverage factors affecting bus transit system availability. 16th Meeting of the EURO Working Group on Transportation. 2014;111:984-93.

Ceder A, Karistrom A, Rydergren C. Optimization of bus stop locations considering equity aspects. Transp Res Part A Pol Pract. 2016:256-69.

Chen Q, Huang J. Bus stop location and service coverage optimization considering different pedestrian behaviors and environmental factors. J Clean Prod. 2022;14(13):318.

Mohammadian A, Miller EJ. Bus stop spacing and pedestrian accessibility. J Transp Eng. 2002;5(128):429- 38.

Nur AS, Siti FM. Factors influencing the willingness to walk to the bus stops in Penang Island. J Malays Inst Plan. 2018;16(1):193-204.

Soest D, Tight MR, Rogers CD. Exploring the distances people walk to access public transport. Transp Rev. 2019;40(2):160-82.

Johar A, Jain SS, Garg PK, Gundalia PJ. A study for commuter walk distance from bus stops to different destination along the routes in Delhi. Eur Transp. 2015;59(3).

Igor I, Jiri H, Lenka Z, Jaroslav B, David F. Factors influencing walking distance to the preferred public transport stop in selected urban centres of Czechia. GeoScape. 2019;1(13):16-30.

Rodriguez GM, Aguero VJ. Walking distances from home to bus stops in San José, Costa Rica: real, perceived, and stated-preference distances. Adv Transp Stud. 2017;43:63-74.

Piotr O, Wibowo SS. Using equivalent walking distance to assess pedestrian accessibility to transit stations in Singapore. J Transp Res Board. 2005;1927(1):38-45.

Basuki I. The willingness to walk of urban transportation passengers: a case study of urban transportation passengers in Yogyakarta Indonesia. J Technol Soc Sci. 2017;1(3):19-26.

Beimborn EA, Greenward MJ, Jin X. Accessibility, connectivity, and captivity: impacts on transit choice. Transp Res Rec. 2003;(1835):1-9.

Hasiao S. Use of geographic information system for analysis of transit pedestrian access. Transp Res Rec. 1997;(1604):50-9.

Loutzenheiser LD. Pedestrian access to transit: model of walk trips and their design and urban. Transp Res Rec. 1997;609:40-9.

Dill J. Transit use and proximity to rail: results from large employment sites in the San Francisco, California, Bay Area. Transp Res Rec. 2003;1835:19-24.

Evans JE, Perincherry V, Douglas GB. Transit friendliness factor: approach to quantifying transit access environment in a transportation planning model. Transp

Res Rec. 1997;1606:32-9.

Grise E, Wasfi R, Ross N, EI-Geneidy A. Evaluating methods for measuring daily walking to public transport: balancing accuracy and data availability. Trans Health. 2019;15:2-11.

Zauki WN. Analysis of walking accessibility to rapid Penang bus services (Route 303) in Penang Island. School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang Island. 2017.

Published

2024-05-10