Household Production, Time Allocation Behavior and Climate Change A Case of Nepal

Authors

Keywords:

Household Production, Forest, Time Allocation, Climate Change

Abstract

This study investigates empirically how forest resources production and time allocation behavior links with climate change issue by using household survey in mid hill village of Nepal. We use Cobb Douglas production function theory to develop household production function econometric model. We use two character households: unemployed and forest dependent population for observation of time allocation behavior for household production. In addition, we use poverty and illiteracy of household characters for understanding its effect on household decision behavior and production behavior. In outcomes of the study, household production behavior of rural people results higher dependency on forest biomass and its consequence-climate change cause issue.

How to cite this article:
Bista RB. Household Production, Time Allocation Behavior and Climate Change A case of Nepal. J Adv Res Civil Envi Engr 2019; 6(2): 21-24.

References

1. Amacher GS, Hyde WF, Kanel KR. Nepali Fuel wood Production and Consumption: Regional and Household
Distinctions-Substitution and Successful Intervention. Journal of Development Studies 1999; 35: 138-63.
2. Pattanayak SK, Sills EQ, Kramer R. Seeing the Forest for the Fuel. Environment and Development Economics
2004; 155-179.
3. Godoy R, Bawa KS. The Economic Value and Sustainable Harvest of Plants and Animals from the Tropical Forest: Assumptions, Hypotheses and Methods. Economic Botany 1973; 47: 215-19.
4. Edmunds E. Government Initiated Community Resource Management and Resource Extraction from Nepal’s
Forests. Journal of Development Economics 2002; 68: 89-115.
5. Reddy S, Chakravarty S. Forest Dependence and Income Distribution in a Subsistence Economy: Evidence from
India. World Development 1999; 27: 1141-49.
6. Adhikari B, Falco SD, Lovett JC. Household characteristics and forest dependency: evidence from common
property forest management in Nepal. Ecological Economics 2004; 48(2): 245-257.

Published

2019-08-28