Cost Effectiveness Assessment of Different Nepalese Cement Brands for Selected Sites of Supermarket
Keywords:
Ordinary Portland Cement, Design Mix, Cost, GradAbstract
The cost of cement is very crucial for the effective construction of any project. Overall objective of this study is to assess the cost effectiveness of cement brands available for ongoing construction projects of Main Supermarket at Bhaktapur, Butwal and Biratnagar. Name of Project(Main) and Brands of Cement(M,Sa & S) are nominated only for Ethical standard though their permission ware taken. The cost difference among applied brands for those sites was evaluated based on design mix. Magnesia oxide, insoluble residue, setting time and compressive strength properties were found to be different as claimed by the manufacturer in their cement certificates. The results of compressive strength test at 28 days showed that M, Sa and S cements have compressive strength of 55.20 MPa, 55.20 MPa, and 48.90 MPa respectively. These values helped to classify M and Sa cements in 53 – Grade &Class – E category whereas S cement in 43 – Grade &Class – D category. Furthermore, results of design mix showed that M and Sa cements could be adopted in the sites under study with minimum cement content of 340 kg/m3 for M20 and 375 kg/m3 for M25 concretes whereas S cement should be adopted with minimum cement content of 360 kg/m3for M20 and 400 kg/m3 for M25 concretes.Sa cement was found to be cheapest with estimated total cement cost of Nrs.52, 917, 177/-& Nrs.26, 710, 803/- or, estimated unit cost of Nrs.6,140/m3& Nrs.5,548/m3for Bhaktapur and Butwal sites respectively whereas, M cement was found to be cheapest for Biratnagar site with estimated total cement cost of Nrs.24, 956, 340/- or, estimated unit cost of Nrs.5.938/m353 grade cement is cost effective in terms of quality, content and rate assessment so further grading of Ordinary Portland Cement should be done.
References
2. Adeagbo D, Kunya S. Review of Waste Management Strategies on Nigerian Construction Sites. ATBU Journal of Enviromental Technology 2003; 2: 49-50.
3. Aldieb MA, Ibrahim HG. Varation of Feed Chemical Composition and Its Effect on Clinker Formation - Simulation Process. Proceedings of The World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2010; 2.
4. Aligizaki K. Definition of Pore Structure parameters. In K. Aligizaki, PoreStructure of Cement-Based Materials Testing, Interpretation and Requirements (p. 19). Taylor and Francis Group. 2006.
5. Association of Engineers. Reduction of Strength of Cement. In Civil Engineer’s Hand Book. Kerala: Kerala Public Works Department. 1981.
6. ASTM:C114-07. Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Hydraulic Cement (Seventh Edition ed.). (A. S. Materials, Ed.) West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United States: American Section of the International Association for Testing Materials. 2007
7. Bohan R. (2017). PCA - America’s Cement Manufacturers. Retrieved June 16, 2017, from www.cement.org: www. cement.org/cement-concrete-applications/howcement-is-made
8. Chitkara K. (2013). Planning Construction Materials. In Construction Project Management - Planning, Scheduling and Controlling (Second ed., pp. 322,323). New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Limited.
9. Duggal S. (2009). Materials for Making Concrete-I Cement. In S. Duggal, & S. Duggal (Ed.), Building Materials (Third Revised Edition ed., p. 146). New Age International. 10. Fathi DM. (2010). Introduction to Cement. In D. M. Fathi (Ed.), Civil Engineering Materials SAB 2112 (p. 49). Malaysia: Department of Civil Engineering RAZAK School of Enginnering & Advance Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) International Campus.
11. Gambhir M. (2013). Concrete Making Materials-I: Cement. In P. Kundu (Ed.), Concrete Technology : Theory and Pratice (Fifth Edition ed., pp. 6,22,30,31,32,33,34). New Dheli: Mc Graw Hill Education(India) Private Limited. 12. Gambhir M. (2010). CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY - Theory and Practice (Fourth Edition ed., Vol. Fifth reprint 2010). (S. Shukla, Ed.) New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Limited.
13. Gambhir M. (2013). Properties of Fresh Concrete. In P. Kundu (Ed.), Concrete Technology : Theory and Practice (Fifth Edidtion ed., pp. 146,147,148,149,150). Delhi: TATA Mc Graw Hill Education(India) Private Limited. 14. Greenwood, R. (2003). In Construction Waste Minimization - Good Practice Guide (pp. 8-10). Cardiff University, Centre for Research in the Built Environment.
15. Hanhan AA. (2004). Influence of the SO3 Content of Cement on the Durability and Strength of Concrete Exposed to Sodium Sulfate Environment. University of South Florida, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of South Florida.
16. Harrisson. (2016, September 28). CemNet.com the home of International Cement review. Retrieved Dec. 07, 2017, from CemNet: https://www.cemnet.com/ Articles/story/160205/loss-on-ignition.html 17. I.S:269:1989. (1993). Ordinary Portland Cement, 33 - Grade Specification. Bureau Of Indian Standards, Bureau Of Indian Standards. New Dheli: Bureau Of Indian Standards.
18. I.S:516-1959. (2002). Methods Of Tests For Strength Of Concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
19. Ibrahimi S, Jamaa NB, Bagane M et al. The Effect of Raw Material’s Fineness and Lime Saturation Factor on Clinker’s Grindability and Energy Efficiency in the Gabes Cement Industry. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST) 2015; 2(11): 3149-3154.
20. IS:4031(Part-5)-1988. (2002). Determination of Initial and Final Setting Times. Bureau of Indian Standards, Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
21. IS:4031(Part-6)-1988. (2002). Determination of Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement other than Masonary Cement. Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
22. IS:456-2000. (2002). Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Practice (4th Revision). Bureau of Indian Standards, Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
23. IS12269:1987. (1988). Specification For 53 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement. Bureau of Indian Standards, Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
24. IS8112:1989. (2005). Scheme of Testing and Inspection For Certification Of 43 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement IS8112:1989. Bureau of Indian Standards, Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
25. Kiattikomol K, Jaturapitakkul C, Tangpagasit J. Effect of Insoluble Residue on Properties of Portland Cement. Cement and Concrete Research 2000; 30(8): 1209-1214.
26. Laskar AI. (2009). Correlatig slump, slump flow, vebe and flow tests to rheological parameters of high performance concrete. Materials Research , 12 (Jan./ Mar. 2009), 6,7.
27. Mahapatra Ak. (2015, July 11). Slide Share. Retrieved Dec. 06, 2017, from Slide Share: https://www. slideshare.net/arunkumarmahapatra1/effect-of-highmg-o-on-cement-expansion.
28. Marsh B. Curing. In J. Newman, & B. Choo, Advanced Concrete Technology. Elsevier. 2003.
29. Mishra AK, Regmi U. Effects of Price Fluctuation on the Financial Capacity of “Class A” Contractors. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts 2017; 5(4): 1920 - 1937.
30. NBC101:1994. (2064). NS 49/2041 Ordinary Portland Cement. Department of Building, UrbanDevelopment and Building Construction. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal Physical Planning and Works.
31. Neville A. (2011). Selection of Concrete Mix Proportions (Mix Design). In Properties of Concrete (Fifth Edition ed., p. 2356). England, England/London: Pearson Education Limited.
32. Padhi S. (2014, Nov. 13). CIVILBLOG.ORG. Retrieved 12 12, 2017, from http://civilblog.org/2014/11/13/ how-to-store-cement-on-site/
33. Raj N, Ilakkiya D. (2014). masterbuilder.co.in. Retrieved 06 18, 2017, from https://www.masterbuilder.co.in/ mix-design-m40-grade-concrete-per-102622009/
34. Singh, V., & Marripoodi, K. (2016). Happho. Retrieved December 03, 2017, from Happho: http://www. happho.com/choose-building-materials-estimatecost-quantities-house-construction/
35. Sinha, S. (2002). Reinforcced Concrete Design (Second Revised Edition ed., Vol. Eighth reprint 2007). New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw-Hill Education. 36. Srinivas, K. (2016). Quora.com. Retrieved 06 21, 2017, from https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-workabilityof-concrete
37. Suvasan C. (2013, Sep.). Indian Cement Review. Retrieved Dec 2017, from Indian Cement Review: http://www.indiancementreview.com/News. aspx?nId=1P2FASAdxyKwVwAoCBYPEg==
38. Swenson E, Evans H. (1953). Determination of The Specific Surface Area of Cements and Pozzolans by The Blaine Air Permeability Method. National Research Council Canada, Division of Building Research. Ottawa: National Research Council Canada.
39. Thomas J, Jennings H. (2017). The Science of Concrete. Retrieved Dec. 13, 2017, from www.iti.northwestern.
edu: http://iti.northwestern.edu/cement/monograph/ Monograph3_7.html
40. Tripathi A. (2015, July). New Business Age. (New Business Age) Retrieved December 03, 2017, from New Business Age: http://www.newbusinessage.com/ MagazineArticles/view/1250.
41. Winter N. (2005). Understanding Cement - Interpreting Cement Science Since 2005. (WHD Microanalysis Consultants Ltd.) Retrieved December 04, 2017, from Understanding Cement - Interpreting Cement Science Since 2005: https://www.understanding-cement.com/ parameters.html#
42. Yusuf G, Aji A, Dammo A et al. Challenges Regarding Management Practice Of Cement On Construction Sites North-Eastern Nigeria. (I. 2278-7461, Ed.) International Journal of Engineering Inventions 2015; 4(8): 23-26. 43. Bhattarai SK, Mishra AK. Existing Scenario of Building Code Implementation in Newly Formed “NagarjunMuncipality” Asian Journal of Science and Technology 2017; 8(11): 6751-6762