A Brief Comparison of R1234YF as an Alternative Refrigerant to R134A in Domestic Refrigerator

Authors

  • Kunal Rathee UG Student, Mechanical Engineering Department, CGC Technical Campus, Jhanjeri, Mohali, Punjab, India. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4444-0561
  • Keshav Kumar UG Student, Mechanical Engineering Department, CGC Technical Campus, Jhanjeri, Mohali, Punjab, India.
  • Pushpendra Densena UG Student, Mechanical Engineering Department, CGC Technical Campus, Jhanjeri, Mohali, Punjab, India.
  • Arun Kumar UG Student, Mechanical Engineering Department, CGC Technical Campus, Jhanjeri, Mohali, Punjab, India.
  • Kirti Prince UG Student, Mechanical Engineering Department, CGC Technical Campus, Jhanjeri, Mohali, Punjab, India.

Keywords:

Ozone Depletion Potential, Global Warming, Refrigeration, R134A, R1234YF.

Abstract

This study examines effect of R1234YF and R-134A in a domestic refrigerator under identical conditions. R11, R12 and R22 are the commonly used refrigerants but they are found to have high ODP and thus have harmful effects on the ozone layer. R134A which is found to be a suitable candidate to replace R12 and is being used as alternate refrigerant but this also has a high GWP. An energy consumption trial had been run to evaluate the performance of R1234YF as drop-in replacement of R134A in a domestic refrigerator and it was found that refrigerant R1234YF performs well which is validated with the available literature.

How to cite this article: Rathee K, Kumar K, Densena P. A Brief Comparison of R1234YF as an Alternative Refrigerant to R134A in Domestic Refrigerator. J Engr Desg Anal 2019; 2(1): 17-20.

References

1. Aziz A, Mainil AK. Performance comparison of a refrigerator system using R134A and hydrocarbon refrigerant (HCR134A) with different expansion devices. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2017; 237(1).
2. Harby K. Hydrocarbons and their mixtures as alternatives to environmental unfriendly halogenated refrigerants: An updated overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017; 73: 1247-1264.
3. Devecio?lu AG, Oruç V. Improvement on the energy performance of a refrigeration system adapting a platetype heat exchanger and low-GWP refrigerants as alternatives to R134A. Energy 2018; 105-116.
4. Jung D, Park B, Lee H. Evaluation of supplementary/ retrofit refrigerants for automobile air-conditioners charged with CFC12. International Journal of Refrigeration 1999; 22(7): 558-568.
5. Lee Y, Jung D. A brief performance comparison of R1234YF and R134A in a bench tester for automobile applications. Applied Thermal Engineering 2012; 35: 240-242.
6. Li Z, Liang K, Jiang H. Thermodynamic Analysis of Linear Compressor using R1234YF. International Journal of Refrigeration. 2019.
7. Longo GA, Mancin S, Righetti G et al. R1234YF and R1234ZE (E) as environmentally friendly replacements of R134A: Assessing flow boiling on an experimental basis. International Journal of Refrigeration 2019; 108: 336-346. 8. Rajamanickam CS, Karthikeyan CP, Samuel AA. Influence of refrigerant (R134A/ R1234YF) properties on cooling performance of an automobile HVAC. Int J Appl Eng Res 2016; 11: 3703-3707.
9. Secretariat O. The Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya, 2000.
10. Solanki N, Arora A, Kaushik SC. Effect of condenser fouling on performance of vapor compression refrigeration system. Journal of Thermodynamics 2015.

Published

2019-12-24