Numerical Simulations of Inlet and Outlet Air Flow Dynamics in Healthy and Stenosis Adult Airway

Authors

  • Ayodele Oyejide Biomechanics Unit, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
  • Olutosoye C Taiwo Clinical Engineering Unit, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Ibadan, NIgeria.
  • Adeyemi A Ayoade Biomechanics Unit, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

Abstract

Most numerical studies of airflow resistance in the lungs have presented flow dynamics in different stenosis tracheobronchial airway generations. However, not much is known about the airflow characteristics in conditions where stenoses are present at both the airflow inlet and out letregions, especially in truncated tracheobronchial airway models. In this study, we constructed a healthy adult airway model and two stenosed airway models made up of generation six to nine (G6-G9). Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed in all airway models to investigate the airflow characteristics. We made comparison between the inlet and outlet air flow dynamics in the healthy and stenosis models during inspiration and expiration to understand if airflow resistance was higher in the upper or lower stenosis airway.Airflow velocity and wall shear stress were greater in the upper airway (G6) for both inspiration and expiration, while wall pressure was highest in the lower airway (G9). The airflow velocities in obstructed upper tracheobronchial airways during inspiration and expiration were about 3.84 m/ sand 1.49 m/s greater than in the lower airways during same respiratory cycle, respectively. The quantitative information in this study shows that stenosis at the lower airway generation has more effect on respiratory airflow than in the upper airway generations.

How to cite this article:
Ayodele OJ, Taiwo OC, Ayoade AA. Numerical Simulations of Inlet and Outlet Air Flow Dynamics in Healthy and Stenosis Adult Airway. J Adv Res Appl Mech Compu Fluid Dyna 2021; 8(3&4): 1-7.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2349.7661.202102

References

Zur KB, Jacobs IN. Management of Chronic Upper Airway Obstruction, In The Requisites in Pediatrics, Pediatric Otolaryngology, Mosby. 2007; 173-189.

Puchalski J, Musani AI. Tracheobronchial stenosis: causes and advances in management. Clin Chest Med 2013; 34(3): 557-567.

Almanzar A, Danckers M. Laryngotracheal Stenosis. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL). 2021. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554561/

Faizal WM, Ghazali N, Khor CY et al. Computational fluid dynamics modelling of human upper airway: A review. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105627

Atzeni C, Lesma G, Dubini G et al. Computational fluid dynamic models as tools to predict aerosol distribution in tracheobronchial airways. Sci Rep 2021; 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80241-0

Mason EC, McGhee S, Zhao K et al. The Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics in the Evaluation of Laryngotracheal Pathology. Annals of Otology. Rhinology & Laryngology 2019; 128(5): 453-459.

Subramaniam RP, Richardson RB, Morgan KT et al. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of inspiratory airflow in the human nose and nasopharynx. Inhalation Toxicology 1998; 10(2): 91-120.

King N, Pepper V, Best C et al. A pilot study: Using computational fluid dynamics to model physiologic airflow through an ovine tissue engineered tracheal graft. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2017; 1(S1): 65-65.

Freitas RK, Schroder W. Numerical investigation of the three-dimensional flow in a human lung model. J Biomech 2008; 41(11): 2446-2457.

Brouns M, Jayaraju ST, Lacor C et al. Tracheal Stenosis: a flow dynamics study. J ApplPhysiol 2017; 102: 1178-1184.

Sul B, Wallqvist A, Morris MJ et al. A computational study of the respiratory airflow characteristics in normal and obstructed human airways. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2014; 52: 130-143.

Endalew, Katiyar. Numerical Simulations of Inspiratory Airflow in Healthy and Asthmatic Human Airway. American Journal of Biomedical Engineering 2019; 9(1): 5-12.

Singh P, Raghav V, Padhmashali V et al. Airflow and Particle Transport Prediction through Stenosis Airways. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020; 17(3): 1119.

Zhu L, Shen J, Gong X et al. Modes of Mechanical Ventilation on Aerodynamics of the Patient-Specific Airway: A Numerical Study. In Proceedings of the 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Berlin, Germany. 2019; 4961-4964.

Chen X, Feng Y, Zhong W et al. Numerical investigation of particle deposition in a triple bifurcation airway due to gravitational sedimentation and inertial impaction. Powder Technol 2018b; 323: 284-293.

Kleinstreuer C, Zhe Z, Chong SK. Combined inertial and gravitational deposition of microparticles in small model airways of a human respiratory system. Journal of Aerosol Science 2007; 8: 1047-1061.

Endalew Getnet T. Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Respiratory Airflow in Tracheobronchial Airways of Infant, Child, and Adult; Hindawi Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2018; 9.

Published

2022-05-10