CFD Modelling for Development of a Small-scale Hydraulic Orifice and Mouthpiece Monitoring Device to obtain Properties
Keywords:
Hydraulic Coefficients, Simulation, Experimental Validating, Mouthpiece, DeviceAbstract
In the field of engineering, knowing the flow dynamics is the essential to specifically regulating the pressure or flow. Historically, in hydraulic experiments, physical structures were developed to test the fluids properties, but they are extravagant as well as time-consuming. Today, the actions of hydraulic systems can be numerically studied in acceptable time and cost through powerful Computational Fluid Mechanics (CFD) protocols. A CFD model is developed in this analysis to simulate a defined framework to evaluate the discharge coefficient, velocity coefficient and orifice contraction coefficient and discharge coefficient of various mouthpieces. The findings of the simulation were checked by performing experiments to identify discharge and by comparing the results obtained against published evidence.
How to cite this article: Mishra GC. CFD Modelling for Development of a Small-scale Hydraulic Orifice and Mouthpiece Monitoring Device to obtain Properties. J Adv Res Appl Mech Compu Fluid Dyna 2020; 7(1): 15-20.
References
2. Akhai S, Singh H. Design Optimization for Modification Of Trough Belt Conveyor To Reduce Material Spillage Used In Clinker Transport In Cement Plant. International Journal Of Research In Advent Technology 2013; 1(4).
3. Bos MG. Discharge Measurement Structures, International Institute for Land Reclamation 1989.
4. Davis CV. Handbook of applied hydraulics, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc 1952.
5. Wei-guo D, Lienhard JH. Contraction coefficients for Borda mouthpieces. Journal of fluids engineering 1081377 (1986).
6. Douglas JF, Gasiorek JM, Swaffield JA. Fluid Mechanics. Prentice Hall; United Kingdom 2001, ISBN 0 582 414768. 7. Junxia G, Fenghe Wu. Investigation of flow through the two-stage orifice. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 2019; 13(1): 117-127.
8. Kanda R, Akhai S, Bansal R. Analysis of MOST technique for elimination of ideal time by synchronization of different lines. International Journal of Research in Advent Technology 2013; 1(4).
9. Lichtarowicz A, Duggins RK, Markland E. Discharge coefficients for incompressible non-cavitating flow through long orifices. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 1965; 7(2): 210-219.
10. Ahmed MF. Study of flow characteristics of different orifices and mouthpieces. Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University. Source - https:// krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810060576
11. Osman, Haitham, Elsayed K et al. Optimal Design of Orifice Flow Meter using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). In International Conference on Aerospace Sciences and Aviation Technology. Aerospace Sciences & Aviation Technology, ASAT-17–April 11-13, 2017; 17: 1-18. The Military Technical College, 2017.
12. Wim S. Cutting Design Costs: How Industry leaders Benefit from Fast and Reliable CFD. (2011).
